Test your Design Thinking knowledge with a free interactive quiz — 20 questions with answers and explanations. No signup needed to play.
Question 1/12Score 0
What is Design Thinking?
In this round
What is Design Thinking?
What is the purpose of building a "prototype" in Design Thinking, and why is a prototype typically kept intentionally LOW-fidelity/quick to build rather than being a polished, fully-functional version?
What is a reasonable way "divergent thinking" and "convergent thinking" relate to the overall structure of the Design Thinking process, as two complementary cognitive modes?
What does the "Empathize" stage of Design Thinking specifically involve, and why is it positioned as the FIRST stage of the process?
What is a reasonable justification for continuing to apply Design Thinking-style user validation even AFTER an initial product/feature has already launched, rather than treating the process as something that only applies before a first release?
What is a reasonable comparison between Design Thinking and Lean Startup methodology (particularly its "build-measure-learn" cycle), given that both emphasize some form of iterative validation before large investment?
What is the purpose of the "Define" stage, and how does a well-crafted "problem statement" (sometimes called a "point of view" statement) from this stage typically differ from a vague, overly broad initial problem framing?
What is a reasonable criticism or limitation some practitioners note about applying Design Thinking rigidly/formulaically, treating it as a strict, guaranteed-to-work checklist process rather than a flexible mindset?
What is the purpose of the "Test" stage, and how does genuine user feedback gathered here typically feed back into earlier stages of the Design Thinking process?
What are the typical stages of the Design Thinking process (as commonly popularized by Stanford's d.school), and in what general order do they occur?
What is a reasonable way Design Thinking's emphasis on empathy/user research can specifically help a team avoid building a technically well-executed solution to the WRONG problem?
What is a reasonable justification for documenting and sharing insights from the Empathize/Define stages broadly across a team (not just with the specific people who conducted the user research), rather than keeping that research locked away with only the researchers themselves?